Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.
Identifieur interne : 002784 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002783; suivant : 002785Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.
Auteurs : Jianju Feng [République populaire de Chine] ; Dechun Jiang ; Huiying Shang ; Miao Dong ; Gaini Wang ; Xinyu He ; Changming Zhao ; Kangshan MaoSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2013.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- MESH :
- génétique : ADN des plantes, Locus génétiques, Plastes, Populus.
- méthodes : Codage à barres de l'ADN pour la taxonomie.
- Analyse de séquence d'ADN, Chine, Spécificité d'espèce, Variation génétique.
- Wicri :
- geographic : République populaire de Chine.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : DNA, Plant.
- geographic : China.
- classification : Populus.
- genetics : Genetic Loci, Plastids, Populus.
- methods : DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic.
- Genetic Variation, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Species Specificity.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Populus is an ecologically and economically important genus of trees, but distinguishing between wild species is relatively difficult due to extensive interspecific hybridization and introgression, and the high level of intraspecific morphological variation. The DNA barcoding approach is a potential solution to this problem.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Here, we tested the discrimination power of five chloroplast barcodes and one nuclear barcode (ITS) among 95 trees that represent 21 Populus species from western China. Among all single barcode candidates, the discrimination power is highest for the nuclear ITS, progressively lower for chloroplast barcodes matK (M), trnG-psbK (G) and psbK-psbI (P), and trnH-psbA (H) and rbcL (R); the discrimination efficiency of the nuclear ITS (I) is also higher than any two-, three-, or even the five-locus combination of chloroplast barcodes. Among the five combinations of a single chloroplast barcode plus the nuclear ITS, H+I and P+I differentiated the highest and lowest portion of species, respectively. The highest discrimination rate for the barcodes or barcode combinations examined here is 55.0% (H+I), and usually discrimination failures occurred among species from sympatric or parapatric areas.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
In this case study, we showed that when discriminating Populus species from western China, the nuclear ITS region represents a more promising barcode than any maternally inherited chloroplast region or combination of chloroplast regions. Meanwhile, combining the ITS region with chloroplast regions may improve the barcoding success rate and assist in detecting recent interspecific hybridizations. Failure to discriminate among several groups of Populus species from sympatric or parapatric areas may have been the result of incomplete lineage sorting, frequent interspecific hybridizations and introgressions. We agree with a previous proposal for constructing a tiered barcoding system in plants, especially for taxonomic groups that have complex evolutionary histories (e.g. Populus).
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071710
PubMed: 23977122
PubMed Central: PMC3747233
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.</title><author><name sortKey="Feng, Jianju" sort="Feng, Jianju" uniqKey="Feng J" first="Jianju" last="Feng">Jianju Feng</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China ; College of Plant Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarimu University, Alar, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China ; College of Plant Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarimu University, Alar, Xinjiang</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Xinjiang</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jiang, Dechun" sort="Jiang, Dechun" uniqKey="Jiang D" first="Dechun" last="Jiang">Dechun Jiang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shang, Huiying" sort="Shang, Huiying" uniqKey="Shang H" first="Huiying" last="Shang">Huiying Shang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dong, Miao" sort="Dong, Miao" uniqKey="Dong M" first="Miao" last="Dong">Miao Dong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Gaini" sort="Wang, Gaini" uniqKey="Wang G" first="Gaini" last="Wang">Gaini Wang</name></author><author><name sortKey="He, Xinyu" sort="He, Xinyu" uniqKey="He X" first="Xinyu" last="He">Xinyu He</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhao, Changming" sort="Zhao, Changming" uniqKey="Zhao C" first="Changming" last="Zhao">Changming Zhao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mao, Kangshan" sort="Mao, Kangshan" uniqKey="Mao K" first="Kangshan" last="Mao">Kangshan Mao</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2013">2013</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:23977122</idno><idno type="pmid">23977122</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0071710</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3747233</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002492</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002492</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002492</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002492</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002492</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.</title><author><name sortKey="Feng, Jianju" sort="Feng, Jianju" uniqKey="Feng J" first="Jianju" last="Feng">Jianju Feng</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China ; College of Plant Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarimu University, Alar, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China ; College of Plant Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarimu University, Alar, Xinjiang</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Xinjiang</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Jiang, Dechun" sort="Jiang, Dechun" uniqKey="Jiang D" first="Dechun" last="Jiang">Dechun Jiang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Shang, Huiying" sort="Shang, Huiying" uniqKey="Shang H" first="Huiying" last="Shang">Huiying Shang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Dong, Miao" sort="Dong, Miao" uniqKey="Dong M" first="Miao" last="Dong">Miao Dong</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Gaini" sort="Wang, Gaini" uniqKey="Wang G" first="Gaini" last="Wang">Gaini Wang</name></author><author><name sortKey="He, Xinyu" sort="He, Xinyu" uniqKey="He X" first="Xinyu" last="He">Xinyu He</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zhao, Changming" sort="Zhao, Changming" uniqKey="Zhao C" first="Changming" last="Zhao">Changming Zhao</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mao, Kangshan" sort="Mao, Kangshan" uniqKey="Mao K" first="Kangshan" last="Mao">Kangshan Mao</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2013" type="published">2013</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>China (MeSH)</term><term>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic (methods)</term><term>DNA, Plant (genetics)</term><term>Genetic Loci (genetics)</term><term>Genetic Variation (MeSH)</term><term>Plastids (genetics)</term><term>Populus (classification)</term><term>Populus (genetics)</term><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA (MeSH)</term><term>Species Specificity (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des plantes (génétique)</term><term>Analyse de séquence d'ADN (MeSH)</term><term>Chine (MeSH)</term><term>Codage à barres de l'ADN pour la taxonomie (méthodes)</term><term>Locus génétiques (génétique)</term><term>Plastes (génétique)</term><term>Populus (classification)</term><term>Populus (génétique)</term><term>Spécificité d'espèce (MeSH)</term><term>Variation génétique (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Plant</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>China</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="classification" xml:lang="en"><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Genetic Loci</term><term>Plastids</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="génétique" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des plantes</term><term>Locus génétiques</term><term>Plastes</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="méthodes" xml:lang="fr"><term>Codage à barres de l'ADN pour la taxonomie</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Genetic Variation</term><term>Sequence Analysis, DNA</term><term>Species Specificity</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Analyse de séquence d'ADN</term><term>Chine</term><term>Spécificité d'espèce</term><term>Variation génétique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>République populaire de Chine</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>Populus is an ecologically and economically important genus of trees, but distinguishing between wild species is relatively difficult due to extensive interspecific hybridization and introgression, and the high level of intraspecific morphological variation. The DNA barcoding approach is a potential solution to this problem.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS</b></p><p>Here, we tested the discrimination power of five chloroplast barcodes and one nuclear barcode (ITS) among 95 trees that represent 21 Populus species from western China. Among all single barcode candidates, the discrimination power is highest for the nuclear ITS, progressively lower for chloroplast barcodes matK (M), trnG-psbK (G) and psbK-psbI (P), and trnH-psbA (H) and rbcL (R); the discrimination efficiency of the nuclear ITS (I) is also higher than any two-, three-, or even the five-locus combination of chloroplast barcodes. Among the five combinations of a single chloroplast barcode plus the nuclear ITS, H+I and P+I differentiated the highest and lowest portion of species, respectively. The highest discrimination rate for the barcodes or barcode combinations examined here is 55.0% (H+I), and usually discrimination failures occurred among species from sympatric or parapatric areas.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE</b></p><p>In this case study, we showed that when discriminating Populus species from western China, the nuclear ITS region represents a more promising barcode than any maternally inherited chloroplast region or combination of chloroplast regions. Meanwhile, combining the ITS region with chloroplast regions may improve the barcoding success rate and assist in detecting recent interspecific hybridizations. Failure to discriminate among several groups of Populus species from sympatric or parapatric areas may have been the result of incomplete lineage sorting, frequent interspecific hybridizations and introgressions. We agree with a previous proposal for constructing a tiered barcoding system in plants, especially for taxonomic groups that have complex evolutionary histories (e.g. Populus).</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">23977122</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2014</Year><Month>04</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Electronic-eCollection"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>8</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2013</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e71710</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0071710</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Populus is an ecologically and economically important genus of trees, but distinguishing between wild species is relatively difficult due to extensive interspecific hybridization and introgression, and the high level of intraspecific morphological variation. The DNA barcoding approach is a potential solution to this problem.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">Here, we tested the discrimination power of five chloroplast barcodes and one nuclear barcode (ITS) among 95 trees that represent 21 Populus species from western China. Among all single barcode candidates, the discrimination power is highest for the nuclear ITS, progressively lower for chloroplast barcodes matK (M), trnG-psbK (G) and psbK-psbI (P), and trnH-psbA (H) and rbcL (R); the discrimination efficiency of the nuclear ITS (I) is also higher than any two-, three-, or even the five-locus combination of chloroplast barcodes. Among the five combinations of a single chloroplast barcode plus the nuclear ITS, H+I and P+I differentiated the highest and lowest portion of species, respectively. The highest discrimination rate for the barcodes or barcode combinations examined here is 55.0% (H+I), and usually discrimination failures occurred among species from sympatric or parapatric areas.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">In this case study, we showed that when discriminating Populus species from western China, the nuclear ITS region represents a more promising barcode than any maternally inherited chloroplast region or combination of chloroplast regions. Meanwhile, combining the ITS region with chloroplast regions may improve the barcoding success rate and assist in detecting recent interspecific hybridizations. Failure to discriminate among several groups of Populus species from sympatric or parapatric areas may have been the result of incomplete lineage sorting, frequent interspecific hybridizations and introgressions. We agree with a previous proposal for constructing a tiered barcoding system in plants, especially for taxonomic groups that have complex evolutionary histories (e.g. Populus).</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Feng</LastName><ForeName>Jianju</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>School of Earth and Environmental Sciences & State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystem, School of Life Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China ; College of Plant Sciences, Xinjiang Production & Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarimu University, Alar, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Jiang</LastName><ForeName>Dechun</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Shang</LastName><ForeName>Huiying</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Dong</LastName><ForeName>Miao</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Gaini</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>He</LastName><ForeName>Xinyu</ForeName><Initials>X</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Zhao</LastName><ForeName>Changming</ForeName><Initials>C</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mao</LastName><ForeName>Kangshan</ForeName><Initials>K</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2013</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>19</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018744">DNA, Plant</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002681" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">China</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D058893" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018744" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Plant</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D056426" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Loci</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014644" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Variation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018087" MajorTopicYN="N">Plastids</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000145" MajorTopicYN="Y">classification</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D017422" MajorTopicYN="N">Sequence Analysis, DNA</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2013</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2013</Year><Month>07</Month><Day>01</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2013</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2013</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2014</Year><Month>4</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>epublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23977122</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0071710</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-13-09872</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3747233</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Mar;9(2):439-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21564673</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2008;177(2):506-16</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18005320</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8613</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20062805</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Dec;29(3):417-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14615184</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2011 Nov;11(6):1012-21</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21722327</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genome. 2002 Dec;45(6):1083-94</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12502253</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 12;101(41):14812-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15465915</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14244-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9826685</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 2004 Sep;91(9):1398-408</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21652373</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313-21</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12614582</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2010;5(10). pii: e13102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013102</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20957043</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2007;2(11):e1154</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17987130</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Oct;28(10):2731-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21546353</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12794-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19666622</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Nov;111(7):1440-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16211377</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 21;101(51):17741-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15598738</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(4):1045-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15773935</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 Jul;10(4):594-605</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21565064</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19451-2</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22109553</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tree Physiol. 2010 Nov;30(11):1383-90</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21030405</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2013 Jan;13(1):144-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23134475</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2012 Nov;196(3):713-25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22861491</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Genet. 2007 Apr;23(4):167-72</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17316886</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tree Physiol. 2011 Apr;31(4):452-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21427158</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 2010 Oct;97(10):1688-97</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21616802</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2007 Oct 12;318(5848):190-1</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17932267</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Aug;44(2):911-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17383902</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2009 Apr;18(7):1396-407</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19284474</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19254</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21637336</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e61337</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23593466</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2008;3(7):e2802</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18665273</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2012 Mar;14(2):374-81</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21973311</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1596-604</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16973872</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1451-2</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19346325</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(5):1792-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15034147</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Fish Biol. 2009 Feb;74(2):329-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20735564</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS Biol. 2004 Oct;2(10):e312</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15455034</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jul;24(7):386-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19409650</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Integr Plant Biol. 2010 Dec;52(12):1109-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21106009</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2007;2(6):e508</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17551588</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 6;108(49):19641-6</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22100737</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26530</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22028897</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1889-95</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16214746</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Oct 29;360(1462):1859-68</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16221604</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:435-58</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17280524</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2013 Feb;22(3):842-55</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22967258</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2010 Jan;19(1):132-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20002578</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 7;102(23):8369-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15928076</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>République populaire de Chine</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Dong, Miao" sort="Dong, Miao" uniqKey="Dong M" first="Miao" last="Dong">Miao Dong</name><name sortKey="He, Xinyu" sort="He, Xinyu" uniqKey="He X" first="Xinyu" last="He">Xinyu He</name><name sortKey="Jiang, Dechun" sort="Jiang, Dechun" uniqKey="Jiang D" first="Dechun" last="Jiang">Dechun Jiang</name><name sortKey="Mao, Kangshan" sort="Mao, Kangshan" uniqKey="Mao K" first="Kangshan" last="Mao">Kangshan Mao</name><name sortKey="Shang, Huiying" sort="Shang, Huiying" uniqKey="Shang H" first="Huiying" last="Shang">Huiying Shang</name><name sortKey="Wang, Gaini" sort="Wang, Gaini" uniqKey="Wang G" first="Gaini" last="Wang">Gaini Wang</name><name sortKey="Zhao, Changming" sort="Zhao, Changming" uniqKey="Zhao C" first="Changming" last="Zhao">Changming Zhao</name></noCountry><country name="République populaire de Chine"><noRegion><name sortKey="Feng, Jianju" sort="Feng, Jianju" uniqKey="Feng J" first="Jianju" last="Feng">Jianju Feng</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002784 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002784 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:23977122
|texte= Barcoding poplars (Populus L.) from western China.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:23977122" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |